disco duck

Is it just me or is the media getting desperate by covering underage felonies. Now by underage I don't that the felonies are underage but those committing them. Here, look at this. You'd think they'd tell you that when you deactivate the phone. I understand the precaution, you know in an emergency even if your phone is deactivated (for whatever reason) you can still call 9-1-1. That's smart. I just hope they throw the book at the 4 year-old.

Just more proof that girls can't drive. Especially underage girls. Especially underage drunk girls. An 8 mile chase? At speeds exceeded 100mph? You realize that this "chase" was maybe 5-6 minutes long? Whew. Her excuse? She was on her way to pick up her sister at a concert. Not the most outrageous thing though. Her blood alcohol level was above .02 which was the legal limit for minors. So wait, let me get this straight there's isn't a zero policy for underage drinking? There's a "legal" limit for underage drinking which is illegal. Weird.

Let's see if I get this right, because the state of Massachusetts is pushing their Secular Humanism homosexual agenda this guy doesn't pass the bar exam? Oh, it violated his First Amendment right... I'm assuming that it violates his right to his free exercise of religion correct? OK, moving on, as a law student he had to understand that the Fourteenth Amendment has been curbing state's power in establishing laws based on religion (The First Amendment) right? And as a schooled individual he knows that secular means 'free of religion' right?
So let's go beyond the religious argument, he wants to be a lawyer right? You think that some day, someone might want a lawyer concerning the matter of gay marriage and maybe it's legality? Oh, and there's no question about abortions? *gasp* Has there been? Could be that this year's bar exam didn't have an abortion question. But being a religious zealot he probably wouldn't have answered that question either, thus still not passing the bar.
Sorry I had to throw that in there, but going beyond religion and law let's just look at the facts. He didn't answer a question. He needed a 270 but instead got a 268 or something. Thus he failed. You should've answered the question huh?
I have never heard of a test violating someone's rights. Still, good luck with that there lawyer-wannabe. I'm going to try it on my next test.

My question, only 14-to-1 odds?